Pro Choice? I don’t think so…
March 6, 2009
Yesterday 55 Pro-ChoiceAbortion Senators voted against a measure that would “require that amounts appropriated for the United Nations Population Fund are not used by organizations which support coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization.”
In other words, a majority of United States Senators apparently approve of funding forced abortions and sterilizations. Three Republicans joined 52 Democrats in defeating the amendment designed to stop funding involuntary abortions. Only three Democrats voted in favor of the amendment to stop funding such atrocities.
Exactly what about these organizations can possibly be considered beneficial for women, let alone pro “choice”? Obviously, “choice” involves at least two alternatives; forced abortion does not qualify. These women are essentially raped and their children are murdered. We fund this?
So can the mainstream American media continue to use the term “Pro Choice” to describe liberals while in the same breath using the term “Anti Abortion” to describe the conservatives on this issue? The label “Pro Choice” has become a farce, at least in the United States Senate.